LB Rose Ranch, LLC v. Hansen Construction, Inc., – clarification of effect of settlements on contribution claims

Settlement agreements are often meant to stop litigation and resolve outstanding claims. However, a recent Colorado Court of Appeals decision held that a settlement agreement does not relieve one settling party from a contribution claim made by a non-settling party under the joint tortfeasor pro-rata liability statute when the settlement did not cover common liabilities…

The economic loss rule no longer bars civil theft – a Colorado Supreme Court game changer in business litigation

The Colorado Supreme Court recently ruled the economic loss rule does not bar recovery for damages on a civil theft claim in Bermel v. BlueRadios, Inc., 2019 CO 31. Chris Bermel, a former employee of BlueRadios, Inc., forwarded company emails with proprietary information to his personal email account, which breached various contracts he entered into…

When is it reasonably necessary to have a third-party present during attorney-client communications? The Colorado Supreme Court weighs in.

When is it reasonably necessary to have a third-party present during attorney-client communications? A new Colorado Supreme Court decision further defined the attorney-client privilege in In re Fox v. Alfini, 432 P.3d 596 (Colo. 2018). The Colorado Supreme Court held that the presence of a third party during an attorney-client communication will destroy the attorney-client…

Residential Property Under CDARA

Colorado homeowners benefit from a provision to the Colorado Construction Defect ActionReform Act (“CDARA”) called the Homeowner Protection Act of 2007 (“HPA”). TheHPA renders contractual provisions that limit or waive CDARA’s rights andremedies void as against public policy when construction defect claims arise ata residential property. In Broomfield Senior Living Owner, LLC v. R.G. Brinkmann,…